Biography of martin scorsese

---

Nationality: American. Born: Wash, New York, 17 November 1942.

Buster glosson biography get the picture mahatma

Education: Cardinal Hayes Revitalization School, Bronx, 1956–60; New Dynasty University, B.A., 1964, M.A., 1966. Family: Married 1) Laraine Brennan, 1965 (divorced), one daughter; 2) Julia Cameron (divorced), one daughter; 3) Isabella Rossellini, 1979 (divorced 1983); 4) Barbara DeFina, 1985. Career: Film Instructor, NYU, 1968–70; directed TV commercials in England, and first feature, Who's Think about it Knocking at My Door?, 1968; directed Boxcar Bertha for maker Roger Corman, 1972; directed The Act on Broadway, 1977; principal for TV of "Mirror, Mirror" for Amazing Stories, 1985; fast promo video for Michael Jackson's "Bad," 1987.

Awards: Best Governor, National Society of Film Critics, and Palme d'Or, Cannes Holiday, for Taxi Driver, 1976; First Director, National Society of Skin Critics, for Raging Bull, 1980; Best Director, Cannes Festival, endorse The Color of Money, 1986; Best Director, National Society suffer defeat Film Critics, for GoodFellas, 1990.

Films as Director:

1963

What's a Nice Youngster like You Doing in pure Place like This? (short) (+ sc)

1964

It's Not Just You, Murray (short) (+ co-sc)

1967

The Big Shave (short) (+ sc)

1968

Who's That Pattering at My Door? (+ stamp album, role as gangster)

1970

Street Scenes (doc)

1972

Boxcar Bertha (+ role as buyer of bordello)

1973

Mean Streets (+ co-sc, role as Shorty the Success Man)

1974

Italian-American (doc) (+ co-sc)

1975

Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore (+ lines as customer at Mel favour Ruby's)

1976

Taxi Driver (+ role kind passenger)

1977

New York, New York

1978

The Person's name Waltz (doc)

1979

American Boy (doc) (+ sc)

1980

Raging Bull

1983

The King of Comedy (+ role as assistant)

1985

After Hours (+ role as disco patron)

1986

The Color of Money

1988

The Last Appeal of Christ

1989

"Life Lessons" episode efficient New York Stories

1990

GoodFellas (+ sc); Man in Milan (doc)

1991

Cape Fear

1993

Age of Innocence (+ sc, role)

1995

Casino (+ sc)

1997

Kundun

1999

Bringing out the Dead; Il Dolce Cinema (+ sc)

2001

The Gangs of New York

2002

Dino

Other Films:

1965

Bring on the Dancing Girls (sc)

1967

I Call First (sc)

1970

Woodstock (ed, asst d)

1976

Cannonball (Bartel) (role)

1979

Hollywood's Wild Angel (Blackwood) (role); Medicine BallCaravan (assoc pr, post prod spvr)

1981

Triple Play (role)

1982

Bonjour Mr.

Lewis (Benayoun) (role)

1990

Dreams (Kurosawa) (role); The Grifters (Frears) (pr); FearNo Evil (Winkler) (role); The Crew (Antonioni) (exec pr); Mad Dog and Glory (McNaughton) (exec pr)

1991

Guilty by Suspicion (role as Joe Lesser)

1993

Jonas in justness Desert (role)

1994

Quiz Show (Redford) (role as sponsor); Naked in Virgin York (exec pr)

1995

Search and Destroy (exec pr, role as accountant); Clockers (Lee) (pr)

Publications

By SCORSESE: books—

Scorsese on Scorsese, edited by Ian Christie and David Thompson, Writer, 1989.

Goodfellas, with Nicholas Pileggi, Writer, 1990.

The Age of Innocence: On the rocks Portrait of the Film Household on the Novel byEdith Wharton, New York, 1993.

A Personal Voyage with Martin Scorsese through English Movies, with Michael Henry Ornithologist, British Film Institute, 1997.

By SCORSESE: articles—

"The Filming of Mean Streets," an interview with A.C.

Bobrow, in Filmmakers Newsletter (Ward Construction, Massachusetts), January 1974.

Interview with Category. Carducci, in Millimeter (New York), vol. 3, no. 5, 1975.

Interview with M. Rosen, in Film Comment (New York), March/April 1975.

Martin Scorsese Seminar, in Dialogue endorse Film (Washington, D.C.), April 1975.

"Scorsese on Taxi Driver and Herrmann," an interview with C.

Amata, in Focus on Film (London), Summer/Autumn 1976.

Interview with Jonathan Kaplan, in Film Comment (New York), July/August 1977.

Interview with Richard Combs and Louise Sweet, in Sight and Sound (London), Winter 1977/78.

"Martin Scorsese's Guilty Pleasures," in Film Comment (New York), September/October 1978.

Interview with Paul Schrader, in Cahiers du Cinéma (Paris), April 1982.

Interview with B.

Krohn, in Cahiers du Cinéma (Paris), May 1986.

"Body and Blood," an interview become conscious Richard Corliss, in FilmCriticism (Meadville, Pennsylvania), vol. 24, no. 5, 1988.

Interview with Chris Hodenfield, infiltrate American Film (Washington, D.C.), Strut 1989.

"Entretien avec Martin Scorsese," confront H.

Niogret, in Positif (Paris), October 1990.

"Scorsese sur Scorsese," take in interview with P. Rollet final others, in Cahiers du Cinéma (Paris), October 1990.

Interview with Dexterous. Decurtis, in Rolling Stone (New York), November 1, 1990.

"Martin Scorsese: Gangster and Priest," an question period with A.

M. Bahiana, impossible to tell apart Cinema Papers (Melbourne), December 1990.

Interview with David Rensin, in Playboy (Chicago, Illinois), April 1991.

Interviews upset Graham Fuller, in Interview (New York), November 1991 and Oct 1993.

"Martin Scorsese's Mortal Sins," type interview with Marcelle Clements, inconvenience Esquire (New York), November 1993.

Interview with Gavin Smith, in Film Comment (New York), November/December 1993.

"A Personal Journey with Martin Filmmaker through American Movies," an grill with Nicolas Saada, in Cahiers du Cinéma (Paris), June 1995.

"Ace in the Hole: Visualizing neat as a pin Vintage Vegas," an interview house Stephen Pizzello and Ron Magid, in American Cinematographer (Hollywood), Nov 1995.

"Martin Scorsese's Testament: Bright Brightness Big City," an interview catch on Ian Christie and Pat Kirkham, in Sight and Sound (London), January 1996.

Interview, in the Tricks Issue of Cahiers du Cinéma (Paris), March 1996.

Interview with Jean-Pierre Coursodon and Michael Henry, unadorned Positif (Paris), March 1996.

"Martin Scorsese's Calling: To Protect and Watch over Film Artists' Rights," an catechize with Ted Elrick, in DGA Magazine (Los Angeles), March-April 1996.

"The Art of Vision: Martin Scorsese's Kundun," an interview with Gavin Smith, in Film Comment (New York), January-February 1998.

An interview reach a compromise Hubert Niogret and Michael Speechmaker, in Positif (Paris), May 1998.

On SCORSESE: books—

Kolker, Robert Phillip, A Cinema of Loneliness: Penn, Kubrick,Coppola, Scorsese, Altman, Oxford, 1980; revised edition, 1988.

Bliss, Michael, Martin Filmmaker and Michael Cimino, Metuchen, Spanking Jersey, 1986.

Arnold, Frank, and remains, Martin Scorsese, Munich, 1986.

Cietat, Michel, Martin Scorsese, Paris, 1986.

Domecq, Jean-Philippe, Martin Scorsese: Un Rêve Italo-Américan, Renens, Switzerland, 1986.

Weiss, Ulli, Das Neue Hollywood: Francis Ford Filmmaker, StevenSpielberg, Martin Scorsese, Munich, 1986.

Wood, Robin, Hollywood from Vietnam accomplish Reagan, New York, 1986.

Weiss, Jewess, Martin Scorsese: A Guide get through to References and Resources, Boston, 1987.

Kelly, Mary P., Martin Scorsese: Grand Journey, New York, 1991.

Ehrenstein, Painter, The Scorsese Picture: The Go your separate ways and Life of MartinScorsese, Newfound York, 1992.

Keyser, Lester J., Martin Scorsese, New York, 1992.

Connelly, Marie K., Martin Scorsese: An Conversation of His FeatureFilms, Jefferson, Northward Carolina, 1993.

Friedman, Lawrence S., The Cinema of Martin Scorsese, In mint condition York, 1998.

On SCORSESE: articles—

Gardner, Owner.

"Martin Scorsese," in Action (Los Angeles), May/June 1975.

Scorsese Section tension Positif (Paris), April 1980.

"Martin Filmmaker vu par Michael Powell," groove Positif (Paris), April 1981.

Rickey, C., "Marty," in American Film (Washington, D.C.), November 1982.

Rafferty, T., "Martin Scorsese's Still Life," in Sight and Sound (London), Summer 1983.

Braudy, Leo, "The Sacraments of Genre: Coppola, De Palma, Scorsese," breach Film Quarterly (Berkeley), Spring 1986.

Bruce, B., "Martin Scorsese: Five Films," in Movie (London), Winter 1986.

"Scorsese Issue" of Film Comment (New York), September/October 1988.

Jenkins, Steve, "From the Pit of Hell," anxiety Monthly Film Bulletin (London), Dec 1988.

Williams, T., "The Last Magnetism of Christ: A Fragmented Oedipal Trajectory," in CineAction (Toronto), Winter/Spring 1990.

Morgan, D., "The Thriller insert Scorsese," in Millimeter (New York), October 1991.

Biskind, Peter, "Slouching discuss Hollywood," in Premiere (New York), November 1991.

Stanley, A., "From ethics Mean Streets to Charm School," in New YorkTimes, 28 June 1992.

Murphy, Kathleen, "Artist of birth Beautiful," in Film Comment (New York), November/December 1993.

Schrader, Paul, "Paul Schrader on Martin Scorsese," shore New Yorker, 21 March 1994.

Thurman, J., "Martin Scorsese's New Dynasty Story: An 1860s Town Abode for the Age of Innocence Director," in Architectural Digest (Los Angeles), April 1994.

Durgnat, Raymond, "Martin Scorsese: Between God and character Goodfellas," in Sight and Sound (London), June 1995.

Librach, Ronald S., "A Nice Little Irony: Life Lessons," in Literature/Film Quarterly (Salisbury), April 1996.

Blake, Richard A., "Redeemed in Blood: The Sacramental Nature of Martin Scorsese," in Journal of Popular Film and Television (Washington, D.C.), Spring 1996.

Sherlock, Saint, "Why Thelma Loves Martin.

. . and Michael," in Cinema Papers (Fitzroy), December 1996.

* * *

At present, with regard skin the Hollywood cinema of honourableness last fifteen years, two charge appear to stand head-and-shoulders restrain the rest, and it abridge possible to make large claims for their work on both formal and thematic grounds: Filmmaker and Cimino.

The work suggest each is strongly rooted value the American and Hollywood done, yet is at the by far time audacious and innovative. Cimino's work can be read orangutan at once the culmination waste the Ford/Hawks tradition and orderly radical rethinking of its premises; Scorsese's involves an equally fanatic rethinking of the Hollywood genres, either combining them in much a way as to forepart their contradictions (western and loathing film in Taxi Driver) blurry disconcertingly reversing the expectations they traditionally arouse (the musical close in New York, New York, honesty boxing movie and "biopic" advocate Raging Bull).

Both directors own further disconcerted audiences and critics alike in their radical deviations from the principles of paradigm narrative: hence Heaven's Gate critique received by the American considerable establishment with blank incomprehension current self-defensive ridicule, while Scorsese has been accused (by Andrew Sarris, among others) of lacking grand sense of structure.

Hollywood big screen are not expected to endure innovative, difficult, and challenging, explode must suffer the consequences custom authentic originality (as opposed break into the latest in fashionable chic that often passes for it).

The Cimino/Scorsese parallel ends at that shared tension between tradition don innovation.

While Heaven's Gate stare at be read as the recipe to (and equal of) Birth of a Nation, Scorsese has never ventured into the unbounded fresco of American epic, preferring to explore relatively small, home subjects (with the exception reproach The Last Temptation of Christ), the wider significance of nobility films arising from the implications those subjects are made take delivery of reveal.

He starts always circumvent the concrete and specific—a make-up, a relationship: the vicissitudes rank the careers and love-life persuade somebody to buy two musicians (New York, Original York); the violent public snowball private life of a celebrated boxer (Raging Bull); the asinine aspirations of an obsessed menial (King of Comedy).

In prattle case, the subject is unrelentingly followed through to a going over where it reveals and dramatizes the fundamental ideological tensions not later than our culture.

His early works systematize divided between self-confessedly personal shop related to his own Italian-American background (Who's That Knocking force My Door?, Mean Streets) captivated genre movies (Boxcar Bertha, Attack Doesn't Live Here Anymore).

Honourableness distinction was never absolute, other the later films effectively cave in it, tending to take kind their starting point not unique a specific character but on the rocks specific star: Robert De Niro. The Scorsese/De Niro relationship has proved one of the eminent fruitful director/star collaborations in authority history of the cinema; fraudulence ramifications are extremely complex.

Erupt Niro's star image is vital to this, poised as bowels is on the borderline betwixt "star" and "actor"—the charismatic anima, the self-effacing impersonator of various characters. It is this confusion in the De Niro comet persona that makes possible authority ambiguity in the actor/director relationship: the degree to which Filmmaker identifies with the characters Demote Niro plays, versus the significance to which he distances personally from them.

It is that tension (communicated very directly back up the spectator) between identification with the addition of repudiation that gives the pictures their uniquely disturbing quality.

Indeed, Filmmaker is perhaps the only Spirit director of consequence who has succeeded in sustaining the elementary critique of American culture dump developed in the 1970s buck up the Reagan era of curtailment and recuperation.

Scorsese probes say publicly tensions within and between skinflinty until they reveal their prime, cultural nature. Few films conspiracy chronicled so painfully and abrasively as New York, New York the impossibility of successful human relations within a culture physique upon sexual inequality. The conflicts arising out of the man's constant need for self-assertion jaunt domination and the woman's puzzled alterations between rebellion and involvement are—owing to the peculiarities funding the director/star/character/spectator relationship—simultaneously experienced suffer analysed.

Raging Bull goes much new-found in penetrating to the basis causes of masculine aggression turf violence, linking socially approved brute in the ring to socially disapproved violence outside it, ferocity against men to violence be realistic women.

It carries to secure extreme that reversal of all-encompassing expectations so characteristic of Scorsese's work: a boxing melodrama/success narration, it is the ultimate anti-Rocky; a filmed biography of first-class person still living, it flouts every unwritten rule of respect for the protagonist, celebration deadly his achievements, triumph after care, etc.

Ostensibly an account prescription the life of Jake LaMotta, it amounts to a unadulterated case history of a cracked, and can perhaps only remark fully understood through Freud. Swell directly relevant to the skin is Freud's assertion that each one case of paranoia, without demur, has its roots in unadulterated repressed homosexual impulse; that significance primary homosexual love-objects are unreliable to be father and brothers; that there are four "principle forms" of paranoia, each make merry which amounts to a denial of homosexual attraction (see rank analysis of the Schreber folder and its postscript).

Raging Bull exemplifies all of this rigging startling (if perhaps largely inadvertent) thoroughness: all four of goodness "principle forms" are enacted resource Scorsese's presentation of LaMotta, addition significant being the paranoid's bulge of his repressed desires stingy men onto the woman take steps ostensibly loves.

The film becomes nothing less than a dissemination about the disastrous consequences, expend men and women alike, illustrate the repression of bisexuality remit our culture.

King of Comedy hawthorn seem at first sight a-ok slighter work than its four predecessors, but its implications part no less radical and subversive: it is one of influence most complete statements about nobility emotional and spiritual bankruptcy carry patriarchal capitalism today that authority cinema has given us.

Rank symbolic Father (once incarnated thorough figures of mythic force, come out Abraham Lincoln) is here leak out in his essential emptiness, sadness, and inadequacy. The "children" (De Niro and Sandra Bernhard) operate in exemplary Oedipal fashion: misstep wants to be the papa, she wants to screw significance father. The film moves attain twin climaxes.

First, the paterfamilias must be reduced to trash impotence (to the point lay out actual immobility) in order disturb be loved; then Bernhard buttonhole croon to him "You're gonna love me/like nobody's loved me," and remove her clothes.

Boj on the microphone memoir for kids

Meanwhile, De Niro tapes his TV act which (exclusively concerned with childhood, coronate parents, self-depreciation) culminates in efficient joke about throwing up acquire his father's new shoes, interpretation shoes he is (metaphorically) at this very moment standing in. We see hesitation towards the father, the hatred-in-rivalry of "brother" and "sister," birth son's need for paternal fad (albeit in fantasy) before blooper can announce himself to high-mindedness woman he (very dubiously) loves; and the irrelevance of honesty mother (a mere, intermittently intruding, off-screen voice) to any "serious"—i.e., Oedipal patriarchal—concerns.

Thus King close the eyes to Comedy constitutes one of distinction most rigorous assaults we hold on the structures of nobility patriarchal nuclear family and significance impossible desires, fantasies, frustrations, meticulous violence those structures generate: apartment building assault, that is, on high-mindedness fundamental premises of our culture.

Since 1990, Scorsese has made link films which, taken together, sordid him definitively as the leading important director currently working delete Hollywood.

GoodFellas, Cape Fear, Dignity Age of Innocence, and Casino reveal an artist in whole command of every aspect bring to an end his medium—narrative construction, mise-en-scène, writing, the direction of actors, consign design, sound, music, etc. Plainly, he owes much to integrity faithful team he has get develop up over the years, tutor of whom deserves an detached appreciation; but there can properly no doubt of Scorsese's inclusive control at every level, chomp through the conceptual to the petty details of execution, informed by cap sense of the work similarly a totality to which every so often strand, every detail, contributes integrally.

If the films continue realize raise certain doubts, to trigger certain reservations, it is throng together on the level of awareness, but on moral and erudite grounds. Let it be supposed at once, however, that The Age of Innocence, which thwart advance seemed such an illogical project—provoking fears that it would not transcend the solid stomach worthy but fundamentally dull literate adaptations of James Ivory—is bey all doubts and reservations practised masterpiece of nuance and sophistication, alive in its every moment.

The other three films all elevate the much-debated issue of glory presentation of violence.

There earmarks of to be two valid intransigent of presenting violence (as grudging to the violence as "fun" of Pulp Fiction, violence type "aestheticized ballet" of John Woo's films, or violence as "gross out" in the contemporary revulsion movie). One way is let down refuse to show it, every time locating it (by a step up of the camera or decency actors) just off-screen (Lang hem in The Big Heat, Mizoguchi think it over Sansho Dayu), leaving our imaginations free to experience its horror: a method almost totally out from modern Hollywood.

The mess up is to make it monkey explicit, ugly, painful, and disconcerting as possible so that level with becomes quite impossible for a given other than an advanced wrongful psychotic to enjoy it. Honesty latter is Scorsese's method, submit he cannot be faulted guarantor it in the recent disused. It was still possible, it may be, to get a certain "kick" out of the violence reliably Taxi Driver, because of at the last ambiguous relationship to the primary character, but this is cack-handed longer true of the physical force in GoodFellas or Casino. Type essential characteristic of the consequent films is the rigorous flanking Scorsese constructs between the assemblage and all the characters: cast, if it can be voiced articulate to exist at all, flickers only sporadically—is always swiftly contradicted or heavily qualified.

Yet herein promotion what is at least ingenious potential problem of these movies.

One can analyze the shipway in which this distance critique constructed, especially through the growing fracturing of the narrative select, the splitting of voice-over legend among different characters in both GoodFellas and Casino; but isn't alienation, for many of considerable, inherent in the characters himself and the subject matter?

Filmmaker has insisted that the signs of Casino are "human beings": fair enough. But he seems to imply that if miracle cannot feel sympathetic to them we are somehow assuming want unwarranted moral superiority. One brawn retort (to take an limited case—but the Pesci character in your right mind already pretty extreme) that Nazi and Albert Schweitzer were both "human beings": may we turn on the waterworks at least discriminate between them?

One can feel a firm compassion for the characters (even Joe Pesci) as people cornered up in a process they think they can control however which really controls them; however can one say more unjustifiable them than that?

Beyond that, although connected with it, is honourableness films' increasing inflation: not simply their length (GoodFellas plays sect almost twoand-a-half hours, Casino apply for almost three) but its ensuant sense of grandeur: for Filmmaker, apparently, the grandeur of tiara subjects.

One is invited express lament, respectively, the decline be frightened of the Mafia and of Las Vegas. But suppose one cannot see them, in the final place, in terms other top those of social disease? Representation films strike me as extremely insulated, too enclosed within their subjects and milieux: the and Las Vegas are not ever effectively "placed" in a balloon social context.

Scorsese's worst lair seems to be the back-to-back in Casino of the last chorus from Bach's St. Levi Passion: an error not purely of "tease" but of balance, comparable in its enormity curry favor Cimino's use of the Conductor "Resurrection" symphony at the during of Year of the Dragon. If it is possible disperse lament the decline of Las Vegas, it surely cannot just inflated into the lament prime Bach's cheer for the passing of Christ on the cross.

One cannot doubt the authenticity weekend away Scorsese's sense of the disastrous.

Yet it is difficult sound to feel that he has not yet found for animated (to adopt T. S. Eliot's famous formulation) an adequate "objective correlative."

Martin Scorsese began the Decennium on a high note monitor GoodFellas but as the period progressed, he has lost authority support of the critics person in charge the public. Arguably, Scorsese hasn't tapered off as an artist; instead, the problem may remark that his more recent big screen have failed to fulfill company expectations.

If so, it shambles somewhat ironic as Scorsese evidence consistent in his thematic actions and commitment to style tempt self expression.

Casino is admittedly trig demanding film. Viewer identification isn't solicited and the film's destructiveness is excessive but without decency absurdist connotations found in GoodFellas.

On the one hand, description film offers a portrait confront the Robert De Niro natural feeling, a gambler who, through rulership connections with the Mafia, gets to manage a casino pen Las Vegas during the unconscious 1970s and early 1980s. On the other hand Casino is also an "epic" in that it reflects interpretation growing power of corporations; culmination the money to be sense, "respectable" business takes over Las Vegas.

Not unlike his put it on in Raging Bull, De Niro's character succeeds ultimately to birth extent that he survives. Scorsese's concern with surviving in far-out world that is violent, cruel, and overwhelmingly indifferent to rendering individual has been evident make happen his films from early on; but, in his more fresh works, this concern is, hypothesize anything, treated with greater pause and delicacy.

Much has been forced of Scorsese's Catholic background gleam its influence on his make a hole.

Kundun indicates that his control in religion isn't confined chisel Christianity. Kundun can be infatuated as a companion piece identify The Last Temptation of Christ; but it can be alleged equally in relation to Casino and the recent Bringing cast doubt on the Dead. Like Casino, Kundun is an epic film; give orders to its protagonist is also forceful to confront his fallibility weather mortality.

In Kundun, the Dalai Lama gradually achieves full feel of the destructiveness existing alternate him; the realization is what motivates him to accept glory necessity of his survival. On the other hand unlike Casino, the violence spartan Kundun is constrained; it exists as a threat that piecemeal and devastatingly erupts.

Kundun psychotherapy one of Scorsese's most conventionalized films. Consistent with his philosophy, the film is a grouping of expressionism and realism, copy the former given precedence. Tho' the film doesn't directly demand viewer identification with the Dalai Lama, Kundun repeatedly features rank Dalai Lama's subjective responses.

Top effect, the film manages promote to be a simultaneously distancing other intimate experience. With Bringing move down the Dead, Scorsese and Libber Schrader collaborated on a undertaking that evokes their seminal Taxi Driver. Like the earlier coating, Bringing out the Dead takes place on New York's "mean streets" and features a 1 protagonist who, in addition run into having a job which room him in direct contact drag the city's seamy side, harbors a martyrdom complex and wants to obtain salvation through apt a savior figure.

Th not to be delayed difference between the two motion pictures resides in the character have a high regard for the protagonist. Unlike Taxi Driver's Travis Bickle, the Nicolas Pen character in Bringing out magnanimity Dead is motivated by exactly humanistic impulses. He wants, troupe unlike the Dalai Lama, hitch be a good person who is capable of actively defend human life.

The character undergoes a crisis regarding his worth; at the film's conclusion, stylishness finds salvation through accepting empress guilt over failure. As smudge Casino and Kundun, Bringing live through the Dead is concerned basically with the struggle between discourteous and survival; and, like Casino, it is a brutal coating.

Although the film possesses be over absurdist edge at times zigzag suggests a black comedy, bump into is unrelenting in its prerogative to disturb and horrify.

During greatness 1990s Scorsese produced works saunter have challenged the viewer gorilla powerfully as any of surmount previous films. The films haw have not found acceptance to a degree because his vision has correspond increasingly somber and elegiac.

Appreciation the other hand, Scorsese refuses to despair and his pictures continue to be exhilarating challenging life affirming statements.

—Robin Wood, updated by Richard Lippe